# Largest use of panel space

**URL:** <https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/largest-use-of-panel-space/8653>\
**Category:** No Judgement\
**Created:** [January 31, 2019, 2:58pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/largest-use-of-panel-space/8653 "2019-01-31T14:58:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gersus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3d9bf3/32.png) [@gersus](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/gersus)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2019, 1:36am UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/largest-use-of-panel-space/8653/19 "2019-02-01T01:36:53Z")

</div>

> [@Who's afraid of BigMaslow?](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/whos-afraid-of-bigmaslow/4629/44):
>
> There’s a lot of leeway. The standard setup has 8113.73 pulses per rev and 63.5mm per rev, so about .008mm per pulse. Even cut in half, that’s respectable resolution.

Am I going to be able to use the standard calibration instructions located here in the wiki since I’ve gone to a 12’ beam?  
I was reading the linked post and its freaking me out a bit.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/largest-use-of-panel-space/8653)._
