# Sequence for firmware update

**URL:** <https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486>\
**Category:** Maslow Firmware\
**Tags:** calibration\
**Created:** [February 6, 2026, 5:51pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486 "2026-02-06T17:51:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjdunes](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forums.maslowcnc.com/jjdunes/32/27264_2.png) [@jjdunes](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/jjdunes)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 5:51pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/1 "2026-02-06T17:51:10Z")

</div>

I just updated my firmware and index to 1.17, from 1.14. So far just did REAT.

Before hitting “Find anchors”, should I reset anything in maslow.yaml?

In particular, I have previously set the x and y scale values. Should those be set back to 1, or does it matter?

How about the previous anchor points? Leave them or set them to 0?

Thanks,  
Joe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ian\_ab](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a587f6/32.png) [@ian\_ab](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/ian_ab)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/2 "2026-02-06T18:02:45Z")

</div>

If you were happy with the Anchor points in 1.14 then you can use the same anchor points in 1.17, no need to Find Anchors. Your X and Y scale values don’t need to change, if they worked for you before just keep them too.  
Generally, unless notified when upgrading, there is no need to update your maslow.yaml file. It is a good idea to keep a copy before upgrading. I usually save it with the current date as part of the name. Of course you have to change the name back to reload it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjdunes](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forums.maslowcnc.com/jjdunes/32/27264_2.png) [@jjdunes](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/jjdunes)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 6:10pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/3 "2026-02-06T18:10:24Z")

</div>

Thanks.  
I’ll go with existing values for now, but what if I want to recalibrate? (I.e., before cutting into marine ply)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ian\_ab](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a587f6/32.png) [@ian\_ab](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/ian_ab)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/4 "2026-02-06T18:30:32Z")

</div>

> [@jjdunes](#):
>
> what if I want to recalibrate?

It won’t hurt, but no need to update existing values, Find Anchors will improve on the existing values. Just make sure you back up the existing maslow.yaml file before you start.

 ![Screenshot 2026-02-07 052537](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/uploads/maslowcnc/original/3X/0/9/0999fd43d112b2ca83c6a521a416bddedac50580.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjdunes](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forums.maslowcnc.com/jjdunes/32/27264_2.png) [@jjdunes](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/jjdunes)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 8:11pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/5 "2026-02-06T20:11:07Z")

</div>

Will do. I’m gonna reset the scale values anyway, and run another test for that after recalibration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dlang](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forums.maslowcnc.com/dlang/32/859_2.png) [@dlang](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/u/dlang)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 11:47pm UTC](https://forums.maslowcnc.com/t/sequence-for-firmware-update/25486/6 "2026-02-06T23:47:06Z")

</div>

Joseph Schroeder wrote:

> Will do. I’m gonna reset the scale values anyway, and run another test for  
> that after recalibration.

In theory, the scale values are not needed if you have the right anchor points,  
so you do want to reset them to zero when you run find anchors again.

we have found that the lower the current limit you can get away with, the more  
accurate the results (you may need to sand the inside of the spools for good  
movement.

David Lang
