For example:
If you run calibration and you get a benchmark error average of 3
Rotational radius of 135
Chainsagcorrection of 28.5
Then you run the triangulation test cut pattern and get a benchmark error average of 6
Rotational radius of 123
Chainsagcorrection of 52.8
Then you up your rotational radius to 140 and get a benchmark average of .3
Rotational radius of 140
Chainsagcorrection of 52.8
If others could repeat that success, then were on to something.
Edit: these are not actual numbers or the process used. Just a “template” or my opinion on how we should post our results and processes.