A new way to think about frame size and angle

[Gero]

I know i should be quiet when the grown-ups are talking. Just can’t help it. i know the .py script is just giving rough guidance and after re-framing to 11.5 ft again believe in a ratio in scale of a sheet.

Is it true that there is an optimum ratio between width and hight of the frame?

And I did (feeling a bit stupid now) None of this is claimed to be true. Just some random outcome of spending time being wasted, without the feeling of wasting time. [TrueOrNot-v2] No 1 is the guy that bought a lighthouse and the Maslow. He thought: ‘The wider and higher the better? I don’t have width, but height! My frame will have the ratio 1:1.’ He ended up with a frame 3.65 m (~11.98 ft) in hight and width to fit his plywood in the ‘comfort zone’ of the py script. (Yes, he could have …