I hate to harp on my own postings, but please read the page on accuracy issues
With triangular kinematics you only have two contruction time variables
-
the distance between the motors, which we can measure pretty accurately (down
to the limits of accuracy of the chain, somewhere around 0.1mm) -
the distance from the center of the bit to the chains.
As I show in this thread
making two marks that are an expected distance from each other in the vertical
center line (and then measuring the expected distance) is enough to calculate
the distance from the center of the bit to the chains to an accuracy of 2x the
accuracy of your measurement (so if you can measure to 1/2mm, your resulting
accuracy is ~1/4mm)
This is if you make one mark in the center, and another one up 500mm
If you were instead to make one down 500mm and the other up 500mm from center,
you would be able to be accurate to ~4x your measurement (so if you can measure
1/2mm, you would be accurate to ~1/8mm)
marks from side to side are not going to be anywhere near accurate until you get
things accurate so that marks up and down the centerline are accurate.
Once you have things so that your marks up and down the centerline are accurate,
everything else is going to be pretty darn close (except for chain sag)
Right now the current calibration isn’t anywhere close to being efficient. It’s
- guess
- cut
- measure horizontal and vertical (which are not independent items)
- alter your guess based on which was larger horizontal or vertical (with no
real idea how far to modify your guess) - move to a different location on the workspace (which means that the
errors will show up differently - if the difference is ‘too large’, goto 1
It should be
- move to the center (or close to the center in steps of one tooth so you can
mark the chains at the center location) - make test cuts
- measure the actual distance between the test cuts
- calculate the correct values
ready to cut accurately.