For kicks I will run the calibration with the exhaust port 180 from what I’m doing and see how the machine values follow. I’m wondering if there is a similar keystone effect.
1 Like
I love that idea!
I re-ran the job with bot 180 degrees rotated and the following are the results. This was also with the z offsets changed to match anchor heights.
Calibration values Rotated:
Fitness: 3.1542010014588175
Maslow_tlX: 3.9
Maslow_tlY: 2321.3
Maslow_trX: 3585.2
Maslow_trY: 2319.8
Maslow_blX: 0.0
Maslow_blY: 0.0
Maslow_brX: 3603.5
Maslow_brY: 0.0
For reference, the following are the unflipped readings from the previous post/log.
Calibration values:
Fitness: 2.4419750107813196
Maslow_tlX: -27.1
Maslow_tlY: 2316.9
Maslow_trX: 3581.3
Maslow_trY: 2325.1
Maslow_blX: 0.0
Maslow_blY: 0.0
Maslow_brX: 3576.0
Maslow_brY: 0.0
Maslow-serial Updated anchor Z values 180 Flipped.log (36.4 KB)
Would it be worth re-running any of these to get back to back comparisons? -Scott
1 Like
More data is always valuable, but I haven’t spotted a pattern to dig into yet.
The next thing that I want to explore is looking at how running the calibration process multiple times back to back changes the results.
In theory it shouldn’t make a difference, but that is to be tested