went back to 0.69 and ran another 6x6 after putting a masonite sheet (much smoother than my OSB).
cal-04-21.txt (24.2 KB)
(vs M4: Calibration fail observations, large portrait vertical - #134 by ronlawrence3) which got worse fitness on that trial. I will reload 0.69.1 and try again and edit that onto the bottom of this post… I think things improved. I wish I knew whether this has to do with less friction or newer computations or ???.
EDIT: 0.69.1 run: .22 fitness at the end of 2 rounds. (compare to M4: Calibration fail observations, large portrait vertical - #139 by ronlawrence3 which was .22 fitness)
cal-04-21-02-69.1.txt (6.0 KB)