The angle of the belt? I have a digital angle finder and could use that to see how it relates to the ground. Not sure how level the frame is though, might have to measure that and factor it in too.
the angle of the arms, or more specifically, how much further they swing with
the ears clipped. with a digital angle finder, you should be able to put it up
against a wall, move the arm to one extreme, zero the angle finder, then move it
to the other extreme.
@dlang about 58-59 degrees for the top arms, 56 for the BR arm when I rotated the router cable out of the way, and 50 for the BL arm which contacted the Z mount as you explained.
the belt end does not have straight sides, It looks like you measured against
the side while the belt end was square against the arm. could you measure both
sides of the belt end?
can you measure two arms against the sides towers (so I can figure out how
close the top left and bottom left arms can get to each other)
that should let me draw out everything and get all the angles
Also trying to calibrate now, and while the arms no longer hit anything, the top far belt, when on either far side of the workpiece, releases a bunch of belt then tries to measure itself (can see the motor running.) seems like maybe something up with the software or calibration procedure? It’s tight when jogging to the next position.
Also trying to calibrate now, and while the arms no longer hit anything, the top far belt, when on either far side of the workpiece, releases a bunch of belt then tries to measure itself (can see the motor running.) seems like maybe something up with the software or calibration procedure? It¢s tight when jogging to the next position.
Upgraded to 0.88.0 tonight and got the machine to successfully calibrate at 2300x1100 with a 9x9 grid. Fitness was about 0.55 whereas with v0.87.1 it would only get to 0.40 or something. Still had the issue with a slack belt on the edge while calibrating, but seemed to work any way.
The exciting part is with the ears removed and a calibration right to the edges of the workpiece, the scaling issue was reduced yet again. 1200mm from the origin it was only off by about -2mm in either direction on the X axis. Jogging to 800 it was only off by about 1mm. I might try another cut and see if this has solved the scaling issue.
Last notes:
I do think it’d be great to fix that slack belt issue. Seems like it’s not calculating something correctly.
When on the far left of the board, the sled still has some massive tilt especially when moving up. I’m 99% sure it’s caused by the TL arm being the tallest, and the BL the shortest. I’m planning on 3D printing some spaces for the anchors so they are all at a uniform angle. @dlang do you know what an ideal angle for the belts would be? Or how to go about calculating that?