First love the machine, love the concept and the countless hours of thought behind it. Appreciate all that help and have helped me.
So from my perspective there are a few things that could be improved to help with the money end.
The marketing end of things. Like others have post Amazon, web search top hits, maker shows, other maker conventions, etc. not sure of what all you currently do.
Of course you want to evolve the machine but this one should work well for each purchase before moving on to the next model. Work to get this flawless ish. Your after the sale service is great. Need a finished product that you still can keep under a diy and open source umbrella.
Next the build itself. DIY doesn’t need to mean you get so frustrated you want to punt the machine as far as possible. There were so many tips and tricks that were found only after finishing the build and fighting the problems. Not that the forums didn’t cover them it’s that you didn’t even know they were a problem. I’m sure like others I’ve dissembled and reassembled the machine more than a dozen times checking fits, tightness of screws, etc. making adjustments. Everyone’s take on free spinning, fit or how tight screws are can be vastly different. I’ve disassembled and reassembled this so many times I have it down like a pit crew. And I truly believe that 90 percent of all the trouble, frustrations and negativity are introduced through this diy element. So this would require more work on your end. Like the posts about testing the boards I feel the major component of this build and as well the most frustrating and potential for problems is the arms. I feel the arms should be completely assembled and yes tested. How you do that I’m not sure but if you could dream this machine up you should be able to set up an a test for the arms. That way the spools are all the necessary and correct looseness, lubricated, magnets glued correctly and in the proper position to the encoder, motor gear proper distance from idler and arm half, retracts with the proper current, screw properly tightened, etc. When some look at the amount of assembly and the amount of things that could go wrong with some minor assembly tweaks it could make them hesitant and then turn them off of the purchase. Need more problem resolved comments in the forums for those fishing around before they buy.
I think of why I purchased the machine. I didn’t need it but I wanted it so I had to convince myself that I could build it and get it working with little help. I’m not a programmer but can follow directions so even though I had a few hiccups on that end I was able to make it happen. Some may be a little more timid. Still can diy just a little less. Some of the fun is in the build process for some people. Some not so much. Maybe you have to charge a little more to do the upfront work and testing. Your machine is still priced far below anything like it. I don’t think less is more when it comes to this type of purchase. Too many things could go wrong and that leads to bad reviews. If you want to broaden the audience make it easier to assemble and interface with.
Yes it will change the shipping box size. I’m pretty sure I paid for shipping when I ordered this. not really a game changer for me. maybe for others? Maybe multiple smaller boxes if size or weight is the issue??
Narrowing the parts and pieces included in the kit down or have people spend hours and hours printing pieces only for them not to fit right or break I feel will also narrow down the people buying your product. You don’t want to make it more difficult it won’t lead to upselling to others.
The documentation for assembly, operation, troubleshooting, etc. need a little polishing. Forums are great and fortunately most have the same issues so it’s easy to search if you word it correctly. At some point you have to stop changing things to truly refine them. That is especially true for the documentation and operations of the machine including the programming.
So in summary….
Marketing (although as I write this I’m changing my mind) Amazon,top hit on searches, shows, expos, conventions
DIY involvement level to eliminate the human error for critical parts. Stick to known working frame setups like the default one on the site. Any deviation from, although open source, could cause issues and is at your risk.
Documentation and what things should look/behaving and that you don’t have instructions from past builds that aren’t valid anymore. The forum’s are great.
Bryan