Paul Modiano wrote:
No. I don’t know how to do that. Are there any instructions you can point me to?
The xy movement that I witnessed when I manually told it to move z by 1mm was
far too great to have been compensation for a change of 1mm to the XYZ
triangle. Is there a setting somewhere that would allow me to adjust the
level of compensation that xy makes to a z movement?
it just calculates the desired belt length based on the x/y/z triangle from the
anchor point.
If the Z was not all the way down when you did the calibration, or the Z stop
value is not corred (or was not correct when you did the calibration), then the
anchor locations that were calculated are not correct and you will have errors
I have not been able to complete a calibration in a long time. It takes a long while but inevitably ends with WARNING FITNESS TOO LOW. DO NOT USE THESE CALIBRATION VALUES!
I think you may need to troubleshoot this more. what is the fitness that it
calculates? (the default cutoff was 0.5, I think bar lowered it to 0.45)
If your anchors move, if the Z offset values in the config don’t match the
reality of your machine, if the belts aren’t tight as you calibrate, those could
all result in bad anchor coordinates (i.e. a bad calibration)
you may also want to do a manual calibration check and see how close the result
is to what the auto calculated one gives you.
some people have had better results with the manual version, but it depends
HEAVILY on how accurate your measurements are.
David Lang