This is a total grenade lob, because I don’t really have any knowledge of how to even begin down this path but … [\ends throat clear]
I wonder what it would be like if there were a Maslow kit that was:
~2x the cost
based around a spindle with a lot more cowbell
capable of belt speeds that would make higher volume production and scalability more realistic
I’m thinking of all of the pizza businesses that have popped up making really nice quality pies using backyard ovens that suddenly enabled folks to start up a ‘restaurant.’ All because of a new tool that came to market that dramatically shortened the distance between the home oven and a certified Neapolitan style pizza.
Am I making sense? Did I miss the existing thread on this concept?
I wonder what it would be like if there were a Maslow kit that was:
~2x the cost
based around a spindle with a lot more cowbell
the spindle is cheaper outside the US, and about the same in the US
capable of belt speeds that would make higher volume production and scalability more realistic
the rigidity and accuracy is more of a problem than the speed. I think the
version I’m hopeing to be able to support where the belts are anchord to the
sled, not the spindle will help a lot with that.
besides faster and a spindle, what else do you think would be needed?
Are you talking about rigidity of the different spindle housing components or various frames? (I’ve been using concrete anchors…)
Also what are current error tolerances and what would be acceptable in your mind. Like I said this was a total grenade lob – I don’t know anything.
Great question. Maybe:
Great dust collection to keep bit longevity as good as possible.
The belt motors mount at the frame anchor points to hopefully make assembly/repair a little smoother (could have a knock on effect of helping with your rigidity problem too?)